February
5
2017

Modern Law vs. Biblical Law

Modern law vs. biblical law

Old Testament scholar Douglas K. Stuart writes:

Modern societies generally have opted for exhaustive law codes. That is, every action modern society wishes to regulate or prohibit must be specifically mentioned in a separate law… Thus it is not uncommon that criminals in modern Western societies evade prosecution because of a “technicality” or a “loophole” in the law…

Ancient laws did not work this way.  They were paradigmatic, giving models of behaviors and models of prohibitions/punishments relative to those behaviors, but they made no attempt to be exhaustive. 

No Israelite could say: “The law says I must make restitution for stolen oxen or sheep [Exod 22:1], but I stole your goat.  I don’t have to pay you back,” or “The law says that anyone who attacks his father or mother must be put to death [Exod 21:15], but I attacked my grandmother, so I shouldn’t be punished,” or “The law says that certain penalties apply for hitting someone with a fist or a stone [Exod 21:8], but I attacked my neighbor with my foot and hit him with a piece of wood, so I shouldn’t be punished.” Such arguments would have insulted the intelligence of all concerned and made no impact on those rendering judgment.[*]

How foolish to think that justice is served by the way we practice it so often in this country. But one day Jesus will return and then justice will be satisfied. Are you ready to face the judgment of God? There will be no technicalities or loopholes then.



[*] Douglas K. Stuart, Exodus, New American Commentary (Nashville: B & H Publishing Group, 2006), 442-443.

« Back